|
|
Post by Freida Pinto on Jan 10, 2012 18:20:17 GMT -5
Anti-gun |
|
|
|
Post by Émilie Simon on Jan 10, 2012 19:42:52 GMT -5
Émilie: Remember what we said to Rihanna last week about re-using shoots... Well you used from this shoot twice (In a row) last cycle, and now you're using it again, you have more shoots than that.
Anyway... Anti-gun? I don't know if that works, if you had have said World Peace, or anti-war, maybe if could have worked better. Can you have a war without guns? Yes, it's possible. There's just... I am not really sure, the anti-gun message doesn't reach me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Jan 10, 2012 22:24:44 GMT -5
Amanda: I don't see anti-gun at all. This shoot looks familiar. We can hardly see your face. The leg is awkward and has absolutely nothing to do with the theme. I mean, it is a peaceful photograph, but if someone asked me the theme, I would say something along the lines of "tranquility" rather than "anti-guns." Even IF I am going to learn how to fire a gun on Thursday...
You are in a lot of trouble this week, jsyk. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yoona Im on Jan 10, 2012 23:11:52 GMT -5
Yoona: I tried to understand this photo too, but I just can't. There's no neck. I don't think you connect to the camera well, Freida.
|
|
|
|
Post by Emma Watson on Jan 10, 2012 23:22:55 GMT -5
Emma: I also don't really see any connection to the theme, which is too bad, because it's still a lovely photo. The pose is interesting, the hair is beautiful, and the outfit is fantastic. The flowers are also a nice touch. But the anti-gun message really just isn't there at all, and that's too bad.
|
|
