|
|
Post by Lea Michele on Dec 14, 2011 11:34:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Dec 14, 2011 11:56:31 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure it's your job to pick the decade, not ours. What decade is this supposed to represent?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lea Michele on Dec 14, 2011 16:41:16 GMT -5
I chose this one for 1900's. Girls really liked this photo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Émilie Simon on Dec 14, 2011 20:30:22 GMT -5
Émilie: 1900's. I don't think so. 1900's fashion was still very Victorian, this is 1960s if anything. If you called it 1960's fashion, this would've been a really great shot! However!! You've called it 1900's fashion, so you've missed the mark completely. Sorry. My advice: Do research.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex Pettyfer♥ on Dec 14, 2011 22:12:03 GMT -5
Alex: Hm, i dont see the 60s, but it is one of the older one... like i feel like you belong at the hop... like the 50s. I love the outfit, the pose and your hair... your mouth isnt doing much for me though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Émilie Simon on Dec 14, 2011 22:22:45 GMT -5
Émilie: I'd say it's more on the end of the 50's and beginning of the 60's. Still Lea, you've lost a lot of points from me for calling it 1900's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Dec 14, 2011 23:36:52 GMT -5
Amanda: I chose this one for 1900's. Girls really liked this photo. Wrong answer, Lea, I have to say That's a century, not a decade, nay This is the fifties, fifty years after Saying it's 1900 causes laughter This still could be strong, but I'm sorry You look all pretty and starry But the decade you chose is wrong Sorry, Lea, this may be the end of your song |
|
|
|
Post by Yoona Im on Dec 15, 2011 9:12:03 GMT -5
Yoona: I see 50's too, if you said 40s or 60s maybe I still can accept that. Once again my problem is with your face. I'm not liking it. Beside that, there's something off with the overall styling. Didn't work for me
|
|
